Monthly Archive for February, 2010

Speaking of Henson

Published on February 25, 2010 in TV and Writing. 0 Comments

Funny how things pop up. I stumbled over this link on Twitter this morning. It’s a blog post from Sugith Varughese on the writing process Henson and the writers used on Fraggle Rock.

Seeing as I loved FR with all my heart as a kid, it is fascinating as an adult and a writer to get a glimpse into how they constructed each episode. I hope you enjoy.

You can read the post here.

What Henson Knew And Pixar Understood

Published on February 21, 2010 in Writing. 1 Comment

I’ve been thinking a lot about characterization recently. A bit later today I’ll be giving a workshop on how to plot characters. See, I’m a firm believe that while a good, strong plot is essential to any novel, strong character will make or break a story. I’ve seen myself be very forgiving of plot holes when I’m completely engaged in a character and their journey.

This has been brought even more to light for me as I’ve been rewatching some movies with my kids. At Christmas, my oldest daughter bought the Superman movie four pack. We’d been watching Smallville and she wanted to see the original movies. Great! I remember seeing number three as a kid in the movie theatre and thought what a great chance to relive my youth.

PAINFUL!!

I was shocked to see how thin the characters were, their motivation and the large, GLARING plot holes in the story. Yes, they are old, but it was more than them not standing the test of time. Color me more surprised when I realized it was written by Mario Puzo. The Godfather this isn’t. The writers didn’t draw on the rich history of the Superman world, leaving us with only the vaguest of charactures.

I’ve also been watching some of Jim Henson’s older movies with my kids. The Dark Crystal and Labyrinth are AMAZING movies. Like some of the better kids movies out there today, Henson knew that you don’t have to dumb the characters down in order for kids to be engaged. They understand the complexities of adult behavior more than we parents would like to admit. The characters are flawed, make bad decisions, make mistakes, but in the end they realize their errors and come out on top.

Pixar does much the same thing with their movies. My youngest put on Monsters Inc the other day. I was upstairs but could hear the story. There was so much spoken between the lines, the characters were complex and flawed.Finding Nemo is another example. The plots are basic, but the characters are complex landscapes where the writers can build a reaction in the viewed and steadily pull on our emotions.

Building a good character means digging down into their guts and understanding what drives them. Yes, this is very basic, but it shocks me how many people forget this. Jack Bauer and Jack Sparrow will react differently to the same situation (and wouldn’t that be a great movie LOL!) I know myself, I sometimes don’t dig down deep enough to find the core of who my characters are. When I do, I find so much more satisfaction in the resulting story.